US politicians say Chinese garlic poses a 'great threat' to the US, foreign ministry responds
股海静观陶
发表于 2024-12-13 17:38:12
1131
0
0
On the 13th, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning presided over a regular press conference. A reporter asked, according to reports, US Senator Scott recently issued a statement stating that Chinese garlic poses a "great threat" to US food safety and called for a "301 investigation". The "2025 Fiscal Year National Defense Authorization Act" that has been reviewed and passed by the US House of Representatives also includes a clause requiring US military stores to ban the sale of Chinese garlic. What is China's comment on this?
Mao Ning said, 'I don't know if you have noticed, but the lies and fallacies of American politicians have sparked ridicule among Chinese netizens.'. I believe garlic would never dream of posing a 'great threat' to the United States. From drones to cranes, from refrigerators to garlic, more and more Chinese products are being labeled as "national security risks" by the United States. However, which of the so-called evidence and reasons by the US can withstand scrutiny? The world can see very clearly that these are just a cover for the United States to engage in protectionism, abuse national power to contain and suppress China's development, and forcefully promote "decoupling and disconnection".
Mao Ning said that generalizing the concept of national security and politicizing and weaponizing economic, trade, and technological issues will only exacerbate the security risks of the global supply chain, ultimately harming others and oneself. We advise some politicians in the US to have more rational common sense to avoid being laughed at.
CandyLake.com is an information publishing platform and only provides information storage space services.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author only, this article does not represent the position of CandyLake.com, and does not constitute advice, please treat with caution.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author only, this article does not represent the position of CandyLake.com, and does not constitute advice, please treat with caution.
You may like
- Ministry of Foreign Affairs: Take countermeasures against US military industrial enterprises
- Does China restrict the export of certain key minerals? Response from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
- North Korea explicitly defines South Korea as a 'hostile country' through constitutional amendment, Ministry of Foreign Affairs responds
- Indonesia pledges to join BRICS: Ministry of Foreign Affairs welcomes more like-minded partners to join
- Republicans in the US House of Representatives push to cancel China's permanent normal trade relations status. Ministry of Foreign Affairs: Attempting to reverse history
- The Ministry of Foreign Affairs responds to the US plan to issue a new round of chip restrictions on China, stating that it will firmly safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises
- Trump claims that the US will impose a 10% tariff on all Chinese imported goods. Foreign Ministry responds
- EU proposes sanctions on Chinese companies, Ministry of Foreign Affairs urges EU not to apply double standards
- The Ministry of Foreign Affairs announces the decision to take countermeasures against US military industrial enterprises and senior management personnel
- Ministry of Foreign Affairs: Countermeasures against 7 US military industrial enterprises and senior management personnel