Nvidia is in legal trouble: accused of abusing copyrighted works to train NeMo!
ehmhb25
发表于 2024-3-11 10:58:50
1253
0
0
As the biggest beneficiary of the artificial intelligence (AI) boom, Nvidia's chip demand is booming and in short supply. But the company seems to have been in trouble recently: it has been sued by three authors, claiming that the company used their copyrighted books without permission to train its NeMo artificial intelligence platform.
Brian Keene, Abdi Nazemian, and Stewart O'Nan, the three authors, stated that their work was part of a dataset of approximately 196640 books that helped train NeMo to simulate ordinary written language, but they were removed in October due to copyright infringement reports.
In the class action lawsuit filed in the San Francisco Federal Court, the authors stated that the delisting reflects Nvidia's "recognition" of training NeMo on the dataset, thereby infringing on their copyright. Therefore, they demand compensation, but the specific amount is unknown.
It is reported that the works involved in the lawsuit include Keene's 2008 novel "Ghost Walk", Nazemian's 2019 novel "Like a Love Story", and O'Nan's 2007 novella "Last Night at the Lobster".
This lawsuit has dragged Nvidia into an increasing number of lawsuits previously initiated by writers and The New York Times over generative artificial intelligence. Generative artificial intelligence is a technology that creates new content based on inputs such as text, images, and sound.
Previously, Nvidia claimed that NeMo was a fast and cost-effective new option using generative artificial intelligence. The rise of artificial intelligence has made Nvidia the favorite of investors. The company's stock price has risen nearly 600% since the end of 2022, bringing its market value close to $2.2 trillion.
In addition, other companies sued for this technology include OpenAI, which created the artificial intelligence platform ChatGPT, and its partner Microsoft.
CandyLake.com is an information publishing platform and only provides information storage space services.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author only, this article does not represent the position of CandyLake.com, and does not constitute advice, please treat with caution.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author only, this article does not represent the position of CandyLake.com, and does not constitute advice, please treat with caution.
You may like
- State Administration for Market Regulation: Investigating Nvidia in accordance with the law
- Nvidia is suspected of violating the Anti Monopoly Law. The State Administration for Market Regulation has decided to initiate an investigation in accordance with the law
- Nvidia is suspected of violating the Anti Monopoly Law. The State Administration for Market Regulation has decided to initiate an investigation in accordance with the law
- Nvidia is suspected of violating the Anti Monopoly Law. The State Administration for Market Regulation has decided to initiate an investigation in accordance with the law
- Nvidia under investigation for alleged violation of antitrust laws
- Nvidia is suspected of violating the Anti Monopoly Law. The State Administration for Market Regulation has decided to initiate an investigation in accordance with the law
- Nvidia responds to anti-monopoly investigation, market value evaporates overnight by over 600 billion yuan
- How do you view the initiation of an investigation into Nvidia?
- Latest research results from NVIDIA! Opening up more possibilities for robot navigation without the need for maps for real-time perception
- Nvidia expands in China against the trend, attracting talent and adding hundreds of R&D personnel in one year