The content of this article comes from the internet. If it does not match the current situation or there are violations, please contact us. Delete them.
Recently, an Australian website called 'Pearl and Stimulus' has published two consecutive comments on China. An article involves cultural exchange, exploring the interaction between Western countries and China; Another article focuses on economic issues and analyzes the bias in the United States' perception of China's economic strength. Both articles mention the Western bias towards China and analyze why some countries are unwilling to accept and accept China's international status. The article points out that although the data clearly indicates that China is the most powerful country in the world, Western countries have biases and are unwilling to acknowledge this fact. Especially the United States, unwilling to acknowledge the rise of China's economy and striving to maintain its hegemony. However, this bias may overlook important economic data, including assessments of international economic strength. In fact, comparing with GDP as an indicator is not entirely accurate, and purchasing power parity is the more accurate measure. Measured at purchasing power parity, China's economy has surpassed that of the United States. The article delves into the connection between GDP data and purchasing power parity, revealing the fundamental reason why the United States is unwilling to recognize China's economic strength.
The article further points out that the foundation of the United States' national strength is economic strength, and losing its position as the first economic power will directly affect its international status and self interests. Therefore, the United States is not willing to acknowledge this reality. However, this unwillingness to face facts may lead to their loss of international status and influence. As an ally of the United States, Australia has a responsibility to help the United States overcome these biases, confront and accept China's rise. The article concludes by calling on all countries to objectively view China's international status and not be influenced by outdated biases.
The above content and information are all from the internet. The author of this article does not intend to target or imply any specific country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The relevant data and theoretical research are based on online materials. The above content does not imply that the author of this article agrees to be responsible for the laws, rules, opinions, and actions in the article, as well as for the authenticity of relevant information. The author of this article assumes no responsibility or direct or indirect legal liability for any issues arising from the above or related matters.